![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/th_goblin-bigsmile.gif)
Side note: How to simplify "1/15 fortune teller of 15 different fortune tellers" class?
Sharp observation rohdrieag!rohdrieag wrote:...It's no coincidence that the mouse over text is different from prior pages. Page 18. Page 19. Then this one; a simple '20.'
Critical success.
For that matter it's in the page title, and in the link. Goblins - 20. http://goblinscomic.com/comic/20
So this comic shows only 3 at negative hit points. Big Ears, Thaco, and Complains.Tofu wrote:Timeline questions based on http://www.d20srd.org/srd/combat/injuryandDeath.htm.
Round 1 - That nasty pea sized bomb Explosion Attack took place and damage allocated, many at 0 or below hit points.
Round 2 - Party has exposition and discussion about what to do.
Round 3 - Decision to start process to create a Teller - chooses Fumbles
Round 4 - Ceremony Starts - Create a teller - Fumbles.
Round 5 - 1 imprint arrives in Gate
Round 6 - Three imprints arrive
Round 7 - Talking and Charisma Attack by Bone Creatures resolved by Wisdom Roll by ?? Fumbles?
Round 8 - Melee attacks against Bone Creatures
Round 9 - Resolve Melee attacks against Bone Creatures
Round 10 - 13 imprints arrive and more discussion
Round 11 - MinMax resolves to .... anyhow .... you get the drift - ... should the injury stats be dropping to below -9 by now?
Well sure. Being negative means you can't really do anything besides yell insults at the rest of your party in why they are taking so long to get you fixed up.Krulle wrote:"Fine" is relative. They are still in neg. HP....
rohdrieag wrote:...It's no coincidence that the mouse over text is different from prior pages. Page 18. Page 19. Then this one; a simple '20.'
Critical success.
For that matter it's in the page title, and in the link. Goblins - 20. http://goblinscomic.com/comic/20
Plays with Fire wrote:rohdrieag wrote:...It's no coincidence that the mouse over text is different from prior pages. Page 18. Page 19. Then this one; a simple '20.'
Critical success.
For that matter it's in the page title, and in the link. Goblins - 20. http://goblinscomic.com/comic/20
Yes but the Crit Window showed the next critical success or failure within the party would be a failure. So Fumbles cannot have made a critical success... unless there were a failure somewhere between the moment the staff showed the "1" and the moment Fumbles made the check to resist imprints. Maybe his theory to untangle the imprints were good but he fumbled the action. This could work, said Fumbles, meaning there is a reasonable chance of success or failure. It might as well be a simple task, since the Staff of Notangle is powerful enough to untangle any magical binding just by touching it, and Fumble already did that by ccident without even willing it. It has to work. And frankly, it is an easy check. It is likely to work unless you do a critical failure.
I think you're misremembering. It didn't say a 1 would be a Critical Failure, it says it would be a Critical Fumble.Plays with Fire wrote:rohdrieag wrote:...It's no coincidence that the mouse over text is different from prior pages. Page 18. Page 19. Then this one; a simple '20.'
Critical success.
For that matter it's in the page title, and in the link. Goblins - 20. http://goblinscomic.com/comic/20
Yes but the Crit Window showed the next critical success or failure within the party would be a failure.
Thanks. Made me smile.Istaran wrote:Since he was removed prematurely, Kickaxo only absorbed 1/11th of each of the former tellers' powers, and he is quite good at handling elevenths of things.
You are remembering right.Injuryman wrote:Also, side note. A lot of people have been talking about The Pain Cloak, but unless I'm remembering wrong, wasn't that one blue and wrapped around the axe? Did we ever see what this black one Fumbles is wearing actually does?
So, not much info about the Shadowflame cloak, if it even does the same in G:AR and the comic...@[color=red]Thunt[/color]_Goblins wrote:Where did that black cloak come from? I don't recall seeing it in the loot pile"
In the beginning of the comic there is a scene where a couple goblins go into the sacred area, where the statues of their past chiefs were kept. It looked a little like the Adams family graveyard. (http://goblinscomic.com/comic/01142006) You can see 11 chief statues at once, in the last panel.Krulle wrote: -how many tellers did this clan ever have (and thus how many more might come?)?
Ha! My fantasy I'm hoping for and half expecting is that when he finally stands up we will see him without the "monster" on his forehead anymore, signaling that he is brimming with powerful healing magic. Hoping so hard that's what happens! Calling it nowBecause we can't see Fumbles' face in the last 3 panels (as well as in the previous 2, where he's still being "shocked"), I guess his face has changed: I'd guess his Kickaxo/Kickasso mustache is now a real one, and part of him.
Wow, good eye!! I never would have noticed that! So exciting!!rohdrieag wrote:Now... his luck is flipping. It's no coincidence that the mouse over text is different from prior pages. Page 18. Page 19. Then this one; a simple '20.'
Critical success.
I don't believe those are all chiefs. Remember when Chief sat down with CoN and told him "sadly, because you used magic items to defeat Minmax and broke our rules, you can never have a statue carved in your honor when you die." Those statues are for goblins who died bravely in service of their clan, I think, not just for chiefs. Notice also how "Chief Kills-a-Werebear" is the only one named with the title of "chief" before his name.Derkins wrote: In the beginning of the comic there is a scene where a couple goblins go into the sacred area, where the statues of their past chiefs were kept. It looked a little like the Adams family graveyard. (http://goblinscomic.com/comic/01142006) You can see 11 chief statues at once, in the last panel.
Overshot wrote:The critical failure was finding/noticing the LOL PEARL. Seems pretty obvious to me.
InjurymanÔǼ wrote: I think you're misremembering. It didn't say a 1 would be a Critical Failure, it says it would be a Critical Fumble.
Say hello to the new and improved, Critical Fumbles!