I am as excited as you about this information.
Sorry, I haven't posted in this thread... at all, it seems.
I didn't want to post before because i disagreed with your analysis, but didn't complete my own to have enough arguments to state my position.
I'm glad you're going to continue putting a lot of work into this, however I kinda still want to do my own independant analysis, if I'll have time (I won't have, probably, though, for a long while)
Unofficial Timeline Discussion
- SpeaksManyLanguages
- Poorly Locked Patron
- Posts: 331
- UStream Username: dbg_
- Location: Kyiv, Ukraine
- Contact:
- Krulle
- Transcribes Goblins
- Posts: 8261
- Contact:
Re: Unofficial Timeline Discussion
That's indeed an interesting information, and good to keep in mind.
We were always in danger of misinterpreting the mood of a setting into time passage indications...
But now you have even less to fix time passage on, so more and less time passage than originally thought are both possible...
We were always in danger of misinterpreting the mood of a setting into time passage indications...
But now you have even less to fix time passage on, so more and less time passage than originally thought are both possible...
STAR CONTROL: The Ur-Quan Masters finally gets a continuation of the story!
it's fully funded, and all realistic stretch goals reached!
it's fully funded, and all realistic stretch goals reached!
- SGTdude
- Gives Speeches
- Posts: 1116
- UStream Username: SGTdude
Re: Unofficial Timeline Discussion
Speaks (SML) I am sorry that you were given the impression that it was better to not comment because you disagreed with my conclusions. I can be a little forceful with the way I state some.things, but I honestly do encourage input from others. Even if I think that input is wrong. It has happened before that the dissenting voices have caused me to go back and reevaluate my conclusions.
I anticipate that the next itteration of the timeline will be friendlier to comments since the timeline itself is now less rigid. Thank you for the support though, and I look forward to hearing your ideas on what I put out.
I anticipate that the next itteration of the timeline will be friendlier to comments since the timeline itself is now less rigid. Thank you for the support though, and I look forward to hearing your ideas on what I put out.
This user has been Banned. (link to the joke)
- SpeaksManyLanguages
- Poorly Locked Patron
- Posts: 331
- UStream Username: dbg_
- Location: Kyiv, Ukraine
- Contact:
Re: Unofficial Timeline Discussion
Heh, no, it didn't have to do with discouragement or anything like that, just my inner limitations!
- RocketScientist
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 5969
- Location: Massachusetts
Re: Unofficial Timeline Discussion
So is Thunt telling us that we don't know whether it is day or night in any given scene, unless someone tells us? 

- SGTdude
- Gives Speeches
- Posts: 1116
- UStream Username: SGTdude
Re: Unofficial Timeline Discussion
Basically. It does seem confusing because it makes it harder to tell when things happen. But this, along with another thing he told me, might make easier to figure out what happens when. All will be made clear, i hope, when i restart the Unofficial Timeline.
This user has been Banned. (link to the joke)
- SGTdude
- Gives Speeches
- Posts: 1116
- UStream Username: SGTdude
Re: Unofficial Timeline Discussion
Well, THunt made an additional comment to me that helped me understand how a certain thing happened. From that, i have formed a new rule of interpretation for determining order of events. This will still rely on assumptions because the comic is filled with information gaps. However, i believe it will show the comic to be consistent with the thing THunt has drawn and said. But it will be a little tricky at first.
This user has been Banned. (link to the joke)