Re: Please Say this is a Joke
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 2:27 pm
ok now a question pops in my head, why doesn't one of the alt who's fighting a kin the leash, makes killing her a whole lot easier ?
I find the wording to not be unclear. This is Thunt we're talking about. He planned this 8 years ago and I'm sure he worked out the dialogue first. It seems rather clear that when you hold the leash she can't attack anyone, and does not have access to her powers. When no one holds the leash, she does have access to her powers.Marnath wrote:The wording would seem to be unclear. You could be right, or the part about her powers being subdued could be a different part of the sentence.
Unless the WOTC version's abilities were not really why Thunt was interested in Kin. His version might have other abilities.Marnath wrote:I tend to assume the second meaning because if she did have access to her powers when no one is holding the leash then I feel like we'd have seen them used before this. If not by our Kin then certainly by one of the more aggressive Alts.
Rereading that sentence, I'm particularly amused by "she can't commit a violent act, especially against the wielder".Marnath wrote:The wording would seem to be unclear. You could be right, or the part about her powers being subdued could be a different part of the sentence.
Unless Thunt just forgot those SLAs exist, or houseruled them out as plot-breakers, or they just aren't that useful in a massive brawl (I don't know offhand exactly what half-breeds can do, but purebloods' abilities aren't that strong - not to mention that Forgath and Minmax are level 3 humans and a half-blood yuan-ti is ECL 12, so even if she has no class levels she's absurdly powerful and it would make quite a bit of sense to gimp her for the sake of the plot; the collar may or may not have been involved).I tend to assume the second meaning because if she did have access to her powers when no one is holding the leash then I feel like we'd have seen them used before this. If not by our Kin then certainly by one of the more aggressive Alts.
An even better idea occurs to me - why didn't Fogath cast Dispel Magic on the collar of an alt-kin when they were far enough away to likely be out of range of the theoretical explosion (around a corner would be particularly safe, since a magical explosion might be a burst rather than a spread), thereby finding out whether the supposed exploding enchantment actually exists?askstoomuch wrote:ok now a question pops in my head, why doesn't one of the alt who's fighting a kin the leash, makes killing her a whole lot easier ?
That supports my theory, not yours. If she did have powers when the leash isn't held then she would not be kept in a normal cage, it would be a cage that stopped her powers.CelineSSauve wrote: Consider the fact that she was kept in an ordinary cage when Goblinslayer was sleeping, or not in town.
That doesn't really mean much. She could be completely powerless, and he would still do that. I don't think Goblinslayer would be above caging her just for the humiliation.CelineSSauve wrote:Consider the fact that she was kept in an ordinary cage when Goblinslayer was sleeping, or not in town.
CelineSSauve wrote:Consider the fact that she was kept in an ordinary cage when Goblinslayer was sleeping, or not in town.
SamWiser wrote:That doesn't really mean much. She could be completely powerless, and he would still do that. I don't think Goblinslayer would be above caging her just for the humiliation.
I'm not saying she's powerless, I'm saying that Thunt's version of...snakepeople might have different powers than those you'd expect from a WOTC snake person. Powers that can't even be used from a mundane cage.Marnath wrote:That supports my theory, not yours. If she did have powers when the leash isn't held then she would not be kept in a normal cage, it would be a cage that stopped her powers.
Ah, good catch!RocketScientist wrote:Oops, wait. Kin does say that her powers are dampened by the collar, and she's the only one holding onto it at the time. http://www.goblinscomic.com/07142009/
His name is Pan. He's an ogre, albeit a really big not overly intelligent one. He and Yala together are one of my favorite characters.CelineSSauve wrote:Ah, good catch!RocketScientist wrote:Oops, wait. Kin does say that her powers are dampened by the collar, and she's the only one holding onto it at the time. http://www.goblinscomic.com/07142009/
During that scene I'm always watching the... Ogre? Giant? Adorably-cute-yellowish-furry-guy
I was relatively sure of Yala, but since Yala doesn't speak, where did you get Pan's name from?Marnath wrote:His name is Pan. He's an ogre, albeit a really big not overly intelligent one. He and Yala together are one of my favorite characters.
From Tarol.CelineSSauve wrote:I was relatively sure of Yala, but since Yala doesn't speak, where did you get Pan's name from?Marnath wrote:His name is Pan. He's an ogre, albeit a really big not overly intelligent one. He and Yala together are one of my favorite characters.
(Also, I am really rather horrible with names, terms, titles and such IRL, which is why I tend to dodge them when I can.)
Ah, okay. I wasn't sure if I'd missed it in passing during a strip.Marnath wrote:From Tarol.
During that scene I'm wondering what the heck the huge white irregular blob in the foreground in front of the turnstile is....CelineSSauve wrote:Ah, good catch!RocketScientist wrote:Oops, wait. Kin does say that her powers are dampened by the collar, and she's the only one holding onto it at the time. http://www.goblinscomic.com/07142009/
During that scene I'm always watching the... Ogre? Giant? Adorably-cute-yellowish-furry-guy
It completely is that. If Wotco picked a fight, Thunt could win. He would, however, bankrupt himself in the process. All hail our glorious justice system.cwellsx wrote:It seems to me that Goblins is "fair use" and "parody".
Its purpose is to parody Dungeons and Dragons.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use#F ... and_parody
Well Thunt would need to contersue for legal costs and damages for defamation (they would be accusing him of stealing "their" ideas)willpell wrote:It completely is that. If Wotco picked a fight, Thunt could win. He would, however, bankrupt himself in the process. All hail our glorious justice system.cwellsx wrote:It seems to me that Goblins is "fair use" and "parody".
Its purpose is to parody Dungeons and Dragons.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use#F ... and_parody
Which is why I was surprised with them now devolving back into TSR, but that does appear to be the case when one threatens legal action for a monster in the SDR who is being parodied (which is the Cease and Desist that Thunt mentioned got him started with the removal of things).ActsStupidly wrote:HOWEVER, I do know WOTC has been NETOROUSLY LENIANT with this sort of thing for fear of TSR's fate and has actually been why they have been able to popularize D&D nowadays.
Before you get the fine folks at ZOE in WOTC's TSR-esque crosshairs: they are using Pathfinder, not D&D.ActsStupidly wrote:Finally, I would like to mention a few D&D movies(mostly small time independent films or from small studios from outside Hollywood), as I saw requests somewhere along the line so here's a link for Dorkness Riseing and I should probably mention the Scy-fi TV channel movies.
Google says Turkish.misfit119 wrote:Not necessarily. The name, without the accents, is just Ma─ƒlubiyet which means loss or defeat in... Persian I think? So if you just change it to the word with the accent mark it's still more or less the same name, it's just a foreign word and not a direct lift of the proper name and it now means defeat which is pretty much on the nose for a god of goblins.willpell wrote:Maglubiyet is a much bigger problem.
As it happens, Odin sacrificed an eye to drink from the Well of Wisdom. So for goblins, there could be Growdim, who sacrificed an eye for...something more goblin-y.mortissimus wrote:Like Tyr, Odin, Thor and Freja who among their responsibilities included war. Also famous for naming Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday and Friday. Want a day named after you? Being a war-god appears to be a good way.