Page 2 of 3
Re: 30 July 2019 -- Big Ears' Ears
Posted: Thu Aug 01, 2019 10:12 pm
by Krulle
The last one sounds like Duv, who sees herself as a kind of god for the Goblins....
Re: 30 July 2019 -- Big Ears' Ears
Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2019 4:02 am
by SeeAMoose
I read that last prophesy as a Goblin dying to kill a God, perhaps the demon god in the Axe?
Re: 30 July 2019 -- Big Ears' Ears
Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2019 5:27 am
by Generic
SeeAMoose wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2019 4:02 am
I read that last prophesy as a Goblin dying to kill a God, perhaps the demon god in the Axe?
That is my guess as well. I hope it's got nothing to do with what comes in the comic later.
It could also refer to The Dies Deal that killed the Demoness.
Re: 30 July 2019 -- Big Ears' Ears
Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2019 11:45 am
by RayRay
jbrecken wrote: ↑Tue Jul 30, 2019 12:23 pm
I suspect that Ears might get desperate enough and pull a Van Gogh to get the helmet on.
That would be gruesome, but expected. I will hope it doesn't happen, but I suppose it would be hard to stop.
Re: 30 July 2019 -- Big Ears' Ears
Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2019 2:30 pm
by SeeAMoose
Generic wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2019 5:27 am
SeeAMoose wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2019 4:02 am
I read that last prophesy as a Goblin dying to kill a God, perhaps the demon god in the Axe?
That is my guess as well. I hope it's got nothing to do with what comes in the comic later.
It could also refer to The Dies Deal that killed the Demoness.
I don't think it is the latter as that has already happened and as such wouldn't be much of a prophesy.
Re: 30 July 2019 -- Big Ears' Ears
Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2019 3:24 am
by Inspired
Hmm, yeah, given all those posts above, cutting his own ear(s) off seems like a legit move from Ears now.
Even though I understood that he couldn't equip the helmet because his ears weren't fitting, I had the same idea as Moose that the real reason behind that was that Kore had chopped the golem apart (he already finished with some fingers on the panel before), thus rendering the "remote control" useless.
If that's true, it would be nice to see what have remained of said golem before attempting the Van Gogh move so it wouldn't be in vain...
Off topic:
Has any of you played Crusader: No Regret back in the days? This arc reminds me on the parts where you could hijack robots to kill stuff for you.
Re: 30 July 2019 -- Big Ears' Ears
Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2019 8:38 am
by redfeather
So the goblins are back in danger because the helmet won't fit. Well, that's a lame way of bringing the dramatic tension back in. The kind of thing a poor DM might do, to rob his players of a deserved victory through planning.
Re: 30 July 2019 -- Big Ears' Ears
Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2019 1:35 pm
by Krulle
Well, I LIKE IT. this ain' a game, even though the start referred toit, but the Goblins have no players we know of.
And it gives nice moments of fun and comedy, something to smirk about while reading a story.
Although these kind of jokes might work less good if you have the full paper version and can read it in one go.
Re: 30 July 2019 -- Big Ears' Ears
Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2019 2:43 pm
by Rooks
SeeAMoose wrote: ↑Wed Jul 31, 2019 2:10 pm
I will admit that the first time through I missed that the helmet didn't fit because of the ears. Initially I assumed it was because Kore broke part of the golem.
Inspired wrote: ↑Sat Aug 03, 2019 3:24 am
Hmm, yeah, given all those posts above, cutting his own ear(s) off seems like a legit move from Ears now.
Even though I understood that he couldn't equip the helmet because his ears weren't fitting, I had the same idea as Moose that the real reason behind that was that Kore had chopped the golem apart (he already finished with some fingers on the panel before), thus rendering the "remote control" useless.
If that's true, it would be nice to see what have remained of said golem before attempting the Van Gogh move so it wouldn't be in vain...
Off topic:
Has any of you played Crusader: No Regret back in the days? This arc reminds me on the parts where you could hijack robots to kill stuff for you.
I'm with Moose and Inspired here. I think the helmet doesn't work because the golem is destroyed. I'm really leaning that way just due to the ordering of the panels. You specifically see Kore smash the golem before the helmet goes on Ears head. If it was just that it didn't fit due to his ears, there'd be no point in showing Kore smashing the golem.
Re: 30 July 2019 -- Big Ears' Ears
Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2019 3:27 pm
by Generic
Rooks wrote: ↑Sat Aug 03, 2019 2:43 pm
SeeAMoose wrote: ↑Wed Jul 31, 2019 2:10 pm
I will admit that the first time through I missed that the helmet didn't fit because of the ears. Initially I assumed it was because Kore broke part of the golem.
Inspired wrote: ↑Sat Aug 03, 2019 3:24 am
Hmm, yeah, given all those posts above, cutting his own ear(s) off seems like a legit move from Ears now.
Even though I understood that he couldn't equip the helmet because his ears weren't fitting, I had the same idea as Moose that the real reason behind that was that Kore had chopped the golem apart (he already finished with some fingers on the panel before), thus rendering the "remote control" useless.
If that's true, it would be nice to see what have remained of said golem before attempting the Van Gogh move so it wouldn't be in vain...
Off topic:
Has any of you played Crusader: No Regret back in the days? This arc reminds me on the parts where you could hijack robots to kill stuff for you.
I'm with Moose and Inspired here. I think the helmet doesn't work because the golem is destroyed. I'm really leaning that way just due to the ordering of the panels. You specifically see Kore smash the golem before the helmet goes on Ears head. If it was just that it didn't fit due to his ears, there'd be no point in showing Kore smashing the golem.
Oh? We need reasons to show things now? Like that instance where Idle got stabbed in the tummy and then nothing came of it? Or Kore having a flippy shield that is now gone forever and served no purpose? Or the switchbeast! Remember the switchbeast? It... Umh. Killed some Vipers before Biscuit would have killed them anyway?
No. I think it does not fit due to ears being big. That, and being stoic, is his character. And he will cut them off because why not? Every one else of the goblins got twisted or mutilated, so it's his turn now.
Re: 30 July 2019 -- Big Ears' Ears
Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2019 3:40 pm
by Generic
redfeather wrote: ↑Sat Aug 03, 2019 8:38 am
So the goblins are back in danger because the helmet won't fit. Well, that's a lame way of bringing the dramatic tension back in. The kind of thing a poor DM might do, to rob his players of a deserved victory through planning.
I think we missed a great opportunity to put them in danger a while back. Where Kore discarded the "Dungeon gimmic" by just tossing it asside. The Golem should have been out at that point.
Or, we can have a completely empty room with no gimmic. The Goblins are hiding. Kore is talking to himself just like it was planted a while back, and we got to learn something interesting about him. Because right now he is... Dunno, a slow ticking clock? Towards... Something? I don't see his purpose for the story anymore once he forced them into the dungeon.
Re: 30 July 2019 -- Big Ears' Ears
Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2019 9:25 pm
by Shardstorm
Not sure why you read the comic Generic, or why you post here either for that matter.
Re: 30 July 2019 -- Big Ears' Ears
Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2019 11:43 pm
by Generic
Shardstorm wrote: ↑Sat Aug 03, 2019 9:25 pm
Not sure why you read the comic Generic, or why you post here either for that matter.
Good thing you don't need to worry about that.
Re: 30 July 2019 -- Big Ears' Ears
Posted: Sun Aug 04, 2019 2:04 am
by Krulle
Generic wrote: ↑Sat Aug 03, 2019 3:27 pm
Oh? We need reasons to show things now? Like that instance where Idle got stabbed in the tummy and then nothing came of it? Or Kore having a flippy shield that is now gone forever and served no purpose? Or the switchbeast! Remember the switchbeast? It... Umh. Killed some Vipers before Biscuit would have killed them anyway?
No. I think it does not fit due to ears being big. That, and being stoic, is his character. And he will cut them off because why not? Every one else of the goblins got twisted or mutilated, so it's his turn now.
Well, first things first.
Big Ears should've died in Brassmoon City in the original storyline draft. Thunt changed that in short notice.
We may have reached the point where this version of the storyline can merge the original one again...
Second, the switchbeast was the reason why Biscuit got brought to "the border of the viperclan lands" anyway, and therefore the reasonw hy he could escape death. I liked that part. Yes, it is slightly unsatisfying that we don't know with certainty what happened then...
Re: 30 July 2019 -- Big Ears' Ears
Posted: Sun Aug 04, 2019 2:16 am
by Inspired
Shardstorm wrote: ↑Sat Aug 03, 2019 9:25 pm
Not sure why you read the comic Generic, or why you post here either for that matter.
► Show Spoiler
Step 1: Click on username
Step 2: Click "add to foe"
Step 3: Enjoy the filtered messageboard.
Remember: Ignore option is bliss.
We are getting a bit derailed of the topic, here
I wonder if Kore manages to get out again and meets Forgath who also looks like a golem now (does he count as one?), would he get a PTSD assuming he wouldn't be totally insane to begin with?
Re: 30 July 2019 -- Big Ears' Ears
Posted: Sun Aug 04, 2019 4:15 am
by Generic
Krulle wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 2:04 am
[...]
Well, first things first.
Big Ears should've died in Brassmoon City in the original storyline draft. Thunt changed that in short notice.
We may have reached the point where this version of the storyline can merge the original one again...
[...]
I did not know that. So, this whole hell-breaking-loose thing is not really related to Ears all that much?
The one I hope bites it now is Complains. Then he'll have to regrow some hitpoints again, and he can have his demon-plotline advanced.
Re: 30 July 2019 -- Big Ears' Ears
Posted: Sun Aug 04, 2019 11:38 am
by thisnameismeta
Rooks wrote: ↑Sat Aug 03, 2019 2:43 pm
I'm with Moose and Inspired here. I think the helmet doesn't work because the golem is destroyed. I'm really leaning that way just due to the ordering of the panels. You specifically see Kore smash the golem before the helmet goes on Ears head. If it was just that it didn't fit due to his ears, there'd be no point in showing Kore smashing the golem.
If you look at
http://goblinscomic.com/comic/page-15-2019 you'll notice that the golem takes what seems like far more severe damage earlier in the battle with Kore (the swipe that takes a deep cut out of its side) and this in no way impairs Thaco's attempt to put on the helmet. In contrast, in the current comic the golem just seems to lose some fingers before Big Ears has trouble putting the helmet on. Big Ears also seems to be under the impression that it's his ears that are in the way, as you see him try to fit them into the top of the helmet to let it go on after his initially unsuccessful attempt. Also look at this twitter thread -
- where Elli seems to confirm that the problem is the helmet doesn't fit Big Ears.
Re: 30 July 2019 -- Big Ears' Ears
Posted: Sun Aug 04, 2019 2:37 pm
by Rooks
thisnameismeta wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 11:38 am
Rooks wrote: ↑Sat Aug 03, 2019 2:43 pm
I'm with Moose and Inspired here. I think the helmet doesn't work because the golem is destroyed. I'm really leaning that way just due to the ordering of the panels. You specifically see Kore smash the golem before the helmet goes on Ears head. If it was just that it didn't fit due to his ears, there'd be no point in showing Kore smashing the golem.
If you look at
http://goblinscomic.com/comic/page-15-2019 you'll notice that the golem takes what seems like far more severe damage earlier in the battle with Kore (the swipe that takes a deep cut out of its side) and this in no way impairs Thaco's attempt to put on the helmet. In contrast, in the current comic the golem just seems to lose some fingers before Big Ears has trouble putting the helmet on. Big Ears also seems to be under the impression that it's his ears that are in the way, as you see him try to fit them into the top of the helmet to let it go on after his initially unsuccessful attempt. Also look at this twitter thread -
- where Elli seems to confirm that the problem is the helmet doesn't fit Big Ears.
Thank you for the share. That note from Elli would indeed point to me being mistaken.
Generic wrote: ↑Sat Aug 03, 2019 3:27 pm
Oh? We need reasons to show things now? Like that instance where Idle got stabbed in the tummy and then nothing came of it? Or Kore having a flippy shield that is now gone forever and served no purpose? Or the switchbeast! Remember the switchbeast? It... Umh. Killed some Vipers before Biscuit would have killed them anyway?
No. I think it does not fit due to ears being big. That, and being stoic, is his character. And he will cut them off because why not? Every one else of the goblins got twisted or mutilated, so it's his turn now.
I think there is always reasons for an artist to go through the work of detailing something in a scene. Whether that point works with the audience or is carried out long term is a different thing. I felt compelled to discuss each of your points, but as most internet discussions go, I'm sure this won't sway you one way or another.
Idle was stabbed in the belly because she was in a battle. It was detailing part of that scene. And as for "nothing came of it"... yeah... because it's called healing magic. I've always pictured DnD characters suffering wounds like that in every battle as swords fly and magic scorches them. And then, through healing magic, they are fine. It's part of that whole imagination thing that comes with DnD IMO.
Kore having a flipping shield to me was just another instance of showing that Kore had a load of gear and items for handling bad circumstances that would otherwise be problematic for similar characters (i.e. big tank like Paladins with Tower Shields, etc). Yes, it looks like it was lost at this point, but given he's trying to get through a dungeon crawl, it doesn't seem that strange that it was just ditched at some point given all the crap he's going through. I realize I'm very much in the minority here as people lost their minds over the shield, but just my point, for all that its not worth.
The switchbeast was part of a trap for Biscuit. It's a story line that's been seen in tons of books and movies. Throw the hero in the pit with a giant baddie. in this instance the hero managed to flip the script, give the baddie a means of escaping the pit that he's been in forever, and surprise surprise, the baddie killed some things that had trapped it in that pit, and that was much easier to eat than Biscuit. That doesn't seem that far fetched or pointless.
All that being said, as I stated earlier, based on Elli's Twitter reply, it would seem that I was mistaken and that it is simply an issue of fitment.
Re: 30 July 2019 -- Big Ears' Ears
Posted: Sun Aug 04, 2019 5:53 pm
by Piximae
Tofu wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2019 4:39 pm
Nice observation on the prophecy. I had forgotten about those or at least, they did not sit in the front of my mind.
I think its a fair interpretative but I have no idea if it is a realistic interpretation to this event. Mostly because it looks/sounds like the Golem was smashed apart by the sole remaining weapon in Kore's right hand, one of his axes. It could be a reference to BigEears not hearing something, so it is referring to his inattention not his ears being hearing apparatus.
I wonder if the prophecy "
The Dwarf Cries No More" is matched with "
The Ears Will not Hear"? Or even "
Two Coins for a Dead Dwarf" and "
Another Leg Lost".
The prophecy I do look forward to is "
The Death of a Goblin, the Death of a God"... which of our goblins will become unto a God?
I have a feeling that Kore might not be in full control of his body. We know he's cursed, but who's to say he's not fully concious? I feel like he might internally be crying over how he in involuntary killing. It's fully possible he's literally being controlled by a demon. Also might be why he "can't die"
Maybe in an odd twist of date Ears sacrifices himself for Kore's redemption. Refusing the advice of his friends.
Or in just reading way too into it.
Re: 30 July 2019 -- Big Ears' Ears
Posted: Mon Aug 05, 2019 4:50 am
by Generic
Rooks wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 2:37 pm
[...]
I think there is always reasons for an artist to go through the work of detailing something in a scene. Whether that point works with the audience or is carried out long term is a different thing. I felt compelled to discuss each of your points, but as most internet discussions go, I'm sure this won't sway you one way or another.
Idle was stabbed in the belly because she was in a battle. It was detailing part of that scene. And as for "nothing came of it"... yeah... because it's called healing magic. I've always pictured DnD characters suffering wounds like that in every battle as swords fly and magic scorches them. And then, through healing magic, they are fine. It's part of that whole imagination thing that comes with DnD IMO.
Kore having a flipping shield to me was just another instance of showing that Kore had a load of gear and items for handling bad circumstances that would otherwise be problematic for similar characters (i.e. big tank like Paladins with Tower Shields, etc). Yes, it looks like it was lost at this point, but given he's trying to get through a dungeon crawl, it doesn't seem that strange that it was just ditched at some point given all the crap he's going through. I realize I'm very much in the minority here as people lost their minds over the shield, but just my point, for all that its not worth.
The switchbeast was part of a trap for Biscuit. It's a story line that's been seen in tons of books and movies. Throw the hero in the pit with a giant baddie. in this instance the hero managed to flip the script, give the baddie a means of escaping the pit that he's been in forever, and surprise surprise, the baddie killed some things that had trapped it in that pit, and that was much easier to eat than Biscuit. That doesn't seem that far fetched or pointless.
All that being said, as I stated earlier, based on Elli's Twitter reply, it would seem that I was mistaken and that it is simply an issue of fitment.
Oh, don't worry about that. I find internet discussions easier if I see them as just that. Discussions. In particular for non issues like this webcomic. I enjoy them for what they are and am not here to change minds/have my own non-altered.
i think the problem with the shield was how confusing it was in a scene with lots of action and movement. It seemed very very specific for me. "Hey, take note of this. This is important." I think I called it a Chekov's gun when talking to someone.It just seemed so very important, so I expected someone to make some kind of use of it against Kore.
And at this point I think we already established Kore to like his gadgets. I do miss the crossbows though. They were just so cruel,unfair and overpowered. Far better for Kores character than the axes I think.
So, overall, I think one could just have cut the shield flip out and noone would have noticed anything missing.
But, minority? People lost their mind when the shield was lost? Now I am interested, please continue.
► Show Spoiler
To be honest, personally I am quite glad the shield is gone. I think overly large shields on a heavily armoured combatant that is not part of a formation is really silly. Kore, with his preference for being up close and personal should really have a buckler, or better still: no shield at all. But that is really beside any kind of point.
********************
For the "Barbarian goes in the pit with the bear"-trope, it was over a bit to quickly to fully serve that purpose, I think. Biscuit felled a tree with one stroke. It was so effortless for him, so the Switchbeast being there, and changing sides, really did not matter. The same thing would have happened if the Switchbeast was there or not.
Yes, granted: The Beast served as the back-stab from the Vipers. It was the incitement for Biscuit to go back. For that, it served a purpose. Not in proportion to the setup it got though.
If i would have subverted that trope, I would have the Switchbeast do a grand entrance. Large, powerful. Intimidating. And then Biscuit would kill the Switchbeast. With just one stroke of his axe. Bam. Over. Then turn to the Vipers and grin. "Oh, you've messed up now buddies". Then it would also have served a purpose to set up Biscuit as a badass, and Elli would have had the opportunity to show off the cool monster. That same thing did happen in that scene, but it was the Viper "Dies unceremoniously" who filled that role.
Then he would fight back through all of the traps and ambushes that the Vipers used on the Bugbears earlier. Or cleverly circumvent them. It was a huge point a while back how great the Vipers were at dealing with large brute force threats. Now nothing of that happened, and he just got back and murdered them all until Grem put a stop to him.
What happened now is quicker though. And I can appreciate that.
************
Let's see. Idle. Yeah. Sure. Those things happen in DnD. This is not DnD though. It's a webcomic. I don't think the "Alright, that was odd, but that is what happens in DnD" holds any water anymore. Back when people spoke of random encounter tables and politely waited their turn in the initiative order that would have worked. But now?
► Show Spoiler
I can only imagine that DnD session:
GM: Alright. The monsterous Klick wipes you far off the map. You're gone Bowst.
B's P: Naw... But I'm alive?
GM: Maybe, I won't tell.
B's P: Naw...
I's P: I explode in it's mouth using that cool spell you let me have GM!
GM: Anything for you I's P.
*damage rolls*
GM: BAM! It's not moving.
I's P: WHAHA! That was fun! Alright, tell me when I ressurect.
GM: Sure. You're back now.
I's P: Cool!
B's P: Can I come back now?
GM: No.
B's P: Can I have some clerical assistance over here?
F's P: No.
B's P: Naw...
GM: THE FIGHT IS BACK ON!
F's P: Oh shit!
I's P: Oh shit!
B's P: Can I get back now?
GM: No.
B's P: Naw...
Bowst player really need new friends I think...
**************
I thought it was obvious that it was the ears that was to big from how it was depicted. I assume the golem is really resilient, save for maybe it's rune in the forehead.
Re: 30 July 2019 -- Big Ears' Ears
Posted: Mon Aug 05, 2019 10:22 am
by redfeather
Inspired wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 2:16 am
Step 1: Click on username
Step 2: Click "add to foe"
Step 3: Enjoy the filtered messageboard.
Yes, because the mature and responsible way to deal with your problems is to plug your virtual ears to all dissent, so that you can live forever in an echo-chamber hug-box where there's no danger of you ever learning anything, or being forced to grow and adapt to a world which doesn't revolve entirely around your selfish whims. God bless the Internet.
Re: 30 July 2019 -- Big Ears' Ears
Posted: Mon Aug 05, 2019 12:38 pm
by Inspired
redfeather wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2019 10:22 am
Inspired wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 2:16 am
Step 1: Click on username
Step 2: Click "add to foe"
Step 3: Enjoy the filtered messageboard.
Yes, because the mature and responsible way to deal with your problems is to plug your virtual ears to all dissent, so that you can live forever in an echo-chamber hug-box where there's no danger of you ever learning anything, or being forced to grow and adapt to a world which doesn't revolve entirely around your selfish whims. God bless the Internet.
Yep, topic derailing again
Reply at that:
► Show Spoiler
I'm unsure whether you are aware of certain individuals posting on this forum (and NO, we are not talking about Generic), who are literally impossible to argue with or to sway in any "social" direction regarding certain things. (Sorry for the cloudy description, it's deliberate to avoid witchhunting). What would you do with them? I'm pretty sure eventually all your efforts would fail just as the current mods (and other incident related persons) efforts did. And you won't kick them from the party just the same way you won't cease to visit a forum because of some people who refuse to co-exist with peacefully.
Your best option then -at least in my opinion- is to ignore them. It is the mature and responsible way to avoid unnecessary negative emotions, which could escalate to levels that will likely ruin the community experience for third parties too.
And of course (as the next step), the mature and responsible way would also recommend to revisit your stance regarding others and their opinions once in a while. But that won't make the initial point irrelevant. Not being a native speaker I'm unsure whether there is a similar in english, but we have a proverb "It takes two (persons) to make a deal." I think that might describe my point clearer.
In any case, it's certainly not the most mature and responsible way to spew passive-agressively all-knowing sh*t in really broad terms about life and dealing with problems. But what do I know, never understood people. God bless the internet, indeed.
(Of course, I could have just simply written that I see the point you are trying to make and to a good degree I even agree with it. But this ill-mannered composition of sentences gets the worst out of me too. Don't expect to be treated like a princess if you don't make the effort either.)
Back on topic:
Piximae wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 5:53 pm
I have a feeling that Kore might not be in full control of his body. We know he's cursed, but who's to say he's not fully concious? I feel like he might internally be crying over how he in involuntary killing. It's fully possible he's literally being controlled by a demon. Also might be why he "can't die"
You mean something like Durkon had in the Order of the Stick comic? But instead of vampiric posession it's a demon this time?
Re: 30 July 2019 -- Big Ears' Ears
Posted: Tue Aug 06, 2019 5:02 am
by SeeAMoose
redfeather wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2019 10:22 am
Inspired wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 2:16 am
Step 1: Click on username
Step 2: Click "add to foe"
Step 3: Enjoy the filtered messageboard.
Yes, because the mature and responsible way to deal with your problems is to plug your virtual ears to all dissent, so that you can live forever in an echo-chamber hug-box where there's no danger of you ever learning anything, or being forced to grow and adapt to a world which doesn't revolve entirely around your selfish whims. God bless the Internet.
I mean I suppose the mod team could always just start banning people for being trolls ruining the experience of the vast majority of other users. You are aware that option is available to us, right? Because frankly the constant passive-aggressive jabs at everyday users for trying to discuss the comic, enjoy the forum or disagreeing with people are getting old fast.
As much as I adore freedom of speech and as much as I have tried to foster it in this community, we are rapidly approaching the point where we are going to start taking action against users who go out of their way to ruin the experience for other forum members by being nothing but negative and argumentative. If you have a critique of the comic, great, bring it up and discuss it politely, but stop shouting down other users. Don't say I didn't warn you.
Re: 30 July 2019 -- Big Ears' Ears
Posted: Tue Aug 06, 2019 10:40 am
by redfeather
SeeAMoose wrote: ↑Tue Aug 06, 2019 5:02 am
As much as I adore freedom of speech and as much as I have tried to foster it in this community, we are rapidly approaching the point where we are going to start taking action against users who go out of their way to ruin the experience for other forum members by being nothing but negative and argumentative. If you have a critique of the comic, great, bring it up and discuss it politely, but stop shouting down other users. Don't say I didn't warn you.
I am not "shouting down" anyone. I am admonishing those who advocate a course of action which I consider ill-advised, to suggest that they stop directing others to do so something which isn't going to help anyone. It's the same thing I would do if someone told a kid to go play in traffic; I wouldn't trust myself to tell the kid anything, since I'm not good with children, but I would absolutely tell the other adult "You should not be telling children that." If you want to ban me for trying to help improve the community, then tell me now and I'll stop posting completely, so that the ban itself won't be required. I'll just mentally consider this community utterly closed to myself, the same as any other community which cares more about people's shallow, selfish feelings and self-esteem, than their actual health or maturity or other such tangible benefits.
Derail response to Inspired:
► Show Spoiler
Inspired wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2019 12:38 pm
I'm unsure whether you are aware of certain individuals posting on this forum (and NO, we are not talking about Generic), who are literally impossible to argue with or to sway in any "social" direction regarding certain things. (Sorry for the cloudy description, it's deliberate to avoid witchhunting). What would you do with them?
Nothing. They have the right to their opinion; they have the right to express their opinion, as often as they want, and in whatever forums the topic arises in. Everyone has the right to ignore those statements, as in looking at the argument and saying "this isn't interesting to me" and moving on. But to go even further than that, as with the Ignore function of most forums, where you literally never see the person's posts at all, that's going too far. If someone feels the need to do that, then I absolutely have the right to think less of that person, because they have proven themselves unwilling to even try and solve their problems in a mature and responsible fashion.
It is the mature and responsible way to avoid unnecessary negative emotions, which could escalate to levels that will likely ruin the community experience for third parties too.
Negative emotions are a crucial part of life; they do not "ruin" anything. Refusing to acknowledge their presence within yourself, pretending that they don't exist, and that every person who doesn't likewise pretend is a bad person - THAT is what "ruins" things.
And of course (as the next step), the mature and responsible way would also recommend to revisit your stance regarding others and their opinions once in a while. But that won't make the initial point irrelevant. Not being a native speaker I'm unsure whether there is a similar in english, but we have a proverb "It takes two (persons) to make a deal." I think that might describe my point clearer.
The loose English equivalent to that phrase might be "it takes two to tango" (a tango is a kind of dance; this version might be a tad less business-like, and that is an issue, but it's probably close enough). But people have the right to decide who they want to dance with, or who they want to do business with (although government is lately getting into a dangerous habit of forcing people to do business with others when they would choose not to, in the name of mandatory tolerance and acceptance and diversity, all of which is exactly the opposite of *actual* tolerance and acceptance and diversity). My point was, you cannot make an informed decision about a person if you never encounter them. If you hit the ignore button once because you've decided you don't like the person that day, you will never see them doing anything which might induce you to change your mind. Thus, it directly prevents the ignore-er from growing as a person, and it prevents the ignore-ee from having their personal growth acknowledged by the community in general. Both of these are direct harms, which should be prevented.
(Of course, I could have just simply written that I see the point you are trying to make and to a good degree I even agree with it. But this ill-mannered composition of sentences gets the worst out of me too. Don't expect to be treated like a princess if you don't make the effort either.)
I have absolutely nothing against any of what you've said here; the more in-depth discussion is better. I'm glad we partially agree, and I enjoy discussing exactly which parts you disagree with and why (the odds you'll actually change my mind are admittedly minimal, but they're not nonexistent, and that's very much in line with my point, just because someone isn't convinced doesn't mean that they didn't listen, or that it was a waste of time to talk to them - you have no idea how your expressions may gradually integrate into their mental architecture and shape their future character development for years to come, regardless of what seems to be true superficially at the moment). And I certainly don't want to be treated like a princess, particularly given that I am 100% male and very satisfied to remain so forever.
You mean something like Durkon had in the Order of the Stick comic? But instead of vampiric posession it's a demon this time?
Except of course that Kore has been this way for years if not centuries, so we can probably rule out a Crowning Moment of Awesome from the real Kore who's trapped inside the demon's head. Much more likely, the real Kore is the one who has been warped into something that *resembles* a demon, but is still absolutely himself. That version's more horiffic anyway, and thus makes better drama.
Re: 30 July 2019 -- Big Ears' Ears
Posted: Tue Aug 06, 2019 1:52 pm
by Generic
redfeather wrote: ↑Tue Aug 06, 2019 10:40 am
Except of course that Kore has been this way for years if not centuries, so we can probably rule out a Crowning Moment of Awesome from the real Kore who's trapped inside the demon's head. Much more likely, the real Kore is the one who has been warped into something that *resembles* a demon, but is still absolutely himself. That version's more horiffic anyway, and thus makes better drama.
Agreed. I also think that version is better. It's not much of a curse otherwise. More of a possession. He might be forced, but I think he is indeed the agent in this.
We all know by now what spoilers mean in this thread. Off topic below.
► Show Spoiler
If I go to far off topic here, please let me know. I do feel somehow this thread has derailed anyways by now.
The lawful... (good? Neutral? Evil?) part of me just got this to say:
1. I have still not seen an instance of Redfeather shouting anyone down. At the very least not in this thread. I think a warning is completely uncalled for. In particular in a thread where phrases like "Why are you -specific forumite- even here?" and "Do this to shut this person off" has been uttered.
For my own sake, I want to say this.
1. If being negative is an offense, please let me know. Because I know I am. I am nitpicky. Heck, I even work in quality control. If Elli is losing sleep over me rambling about her comic, I'll tone it down or failing that leave. Elli:I am a fan. I enjoy your work. I wanna see where this story goes.
2. If anyone else feel uncomfortable because I don't agree with them... then... No. I want people to be comfortable, but I don't think I am in the wrong then. I do enjoy reading and considering other views on this comic. I will not enjoy people blocking me, but I can't keep anyone from doing so. I will not block anyone myself.
3. If anyone feel uncomfortable because I am acting badly, taking up to much space or insulting anyone, then let me know. I try not to and will tone it down.
And:
4. If anyone feel like discussing why I stick around here, please do so in controversy, PM or where ever. The question has been raised before. Some people is clearly wondering. You got my permission. Just tag me in if you want me to consider leaving my point of view.