The Goblins Fan Forum

As omnipotent other mods say they are, we do not have that power. Only Moose has that power.

Don't worry, i've talked with Moose and he is on it.

Well Feytala, have you given it some thought on if you still want to play?

And Celine, whenever you're ready, go ahead and post what Sam's going to do in the IC thread please.

staron13 wrote:And Celine, whenever you're ready, go ahead and post what Sam's going to do in the IC thread please.

Well, in my last GM post Samantha was waiting on the Nurse (and Rae).

So you were... I guess you don't need to post.

staron13 wrote:So you were... I guess you don't need to post.

I can if you want me to, but I'm waiting to see if Rae will continue to be a PC or not.

Before I went on to actually be "productive" and read a few textbooks, I wanted to get out this blurb:
Samantha Blossom is not he most confident or ambiscious of trainers. While she's rather cute (in a visibly vulnerable way) her low CHA comes from a lack of any real strength of character or people skills. Highly observant and intuitive, she could never wrap her mind around any concept that she hasn't seen in practice herself. While likely not going to hit puberty for a few more Years, Sam already displays a lack of coordination that does not bode well for the future.


There. Now maybe my mind can concentrate on other things.
{*pokes brain and glowers at the lazy thing* }

I thought I already posted it... Nevermind. Yes, I will go on. Has Celine already sent the Raes story to you ?

Feytala wrote:I thought I already posted it... Nevermind. Yes, I will go on. Has Celine already sent the Raes story to you ?

No, I haven't sent anyone's information to the GM. I don't believe I have them anymore.

I shall wait for Rae to post, in that case, then I can reply if Staron13 wants me to?

No I don't have Rae's story... Sorry

And yes once she replies go ahead and have Sam reply.

staron13 wrote:And yes once she replies go ahead and have Sam reply.

Do I assume the Nurse has returned the Pok├®mon at that point, or not?

Yes you do.

I'll look up my saves ( I tend to copy-paste old Pms before I erase them)... if not, I see if I can make another write-up.

Mwahahaha!

I did not expect the Officer to be a challenger (I forgot about that once he passed out, actually ) but Malcolm and Curtis (yes, that Curtis, not the other one [I suck at names!]) were who I had in mind for the pair of dots. *snickers*

I'm making my reply now, then I'll be heading to placement and will not be able to check in for about 11 hours or so.

Uh. Channel uses wis or str stat. Not mod. I know this cause I play two mystics (One being sooooo much better than Carrie )

It is still a failure though

Arch Lich Burns wrote:Uh. Channel uses wis or str stat. Not mod. I know this cause I play two mystics (One being sooooo much better than Carrie )

It is still a failure though

Ah, okay. I shall keep that in mind. Must have been thinking of Capture Specialists.

And yes, utterly failed

Yea capture specialist is mod only, but mystic doesn't get better channeling.


And figures it was them two... >.> I think I am going to loose. Sigh oh well.

Arch Lich Burns wrote:Yea capture specialist is mod only, but mystic doesn't get better channeling.

What do you mean by that? No Features?

And I just realised I mixed up Phil and Klif again. It's not the Officer that was looking for the challenge.

Well....no features that decrease the channeling check. That is what I meant. ...well asides Channel friend and Channel friend +

Arch Lich Burns wrote:Well....no features that decrease the channeling check. That is what I meant. ...well asides Channel friend and Channel friend +

Yeah, that's what I meant too

And I require Channel Friend for Shaman.
Also Zoo-something. I'm too lazy to look it up just now. I finished the activity due tomorrow and am now listening to the podcast episodes for GAR.

Shamans are cool. Body snatcher is better. *has a bias towards bodysnatchers* What can I say? I am a fan of versatility. I really like the ability to change into whomever you want and can accomplish anything you set your mind towards....and if you find the right person.

And Zoopathy It is one of the best mystic abilities.

Also I think I know what the egg species is

Arch Lich Burns wrote:Shamans are cool. Body snatcher is better. *has a bias towards bodysnatchers* What can I say? I am a fan of versatility. I really like the ability to change into whomever you want and can accomplish anything you set your mind towards....and if you find the right person.

I'm not a fan of that one. This one fits Sam's personality and abilities.
She had occasional connections to Pok├®mon.
Soon she'll find it pretty much guaranteed with her Team. (At least when the GM deems them "loyal".)
Then she'll be able to speak to them without channelling them (for 4 hours, even if they move out then back into range, if I am reading that correctly.)
Finally, that link will become so strong that her consciousness will be drawn into the Pok├®mon.

Arch Lich Burns wrote:And Zoopathy It is one of the best mystic abilities.

It does seem interesting. Though you already have Telepathy as part of Channelling.

Arch Lich Burns wrote:Also I think I know what the egg species is

I know nothing?

Body snatcher varies from person to person (character or otherwise). My bodysnatcher in a good mood is rather playful and likes pranking people in various forms. Her most recent prank was wearing a red dress as one of the male characters and send the picture to other party members She is more than just pranks...but that is the general gist.


Zoopathy has no range! So she can talk to them over long distances! Also you don't loose as much hp as Channeling...and against wild mons it is automatic.

Arch Lich Burns wrote:Zoopathy has no range! So she can talk to them over long distances! Also you don't loose as much hp as Channeling...and against wild mons it is automatic.

I think that first bit depends on your GM. It doesn't say you can communicate non-verbally.
"Effect: You can talk to the Pokemon in its language for 4 hours."

Also, the requirement of "Channel Friend" seems to imply that it can only be used on Loyal Pok├®mon.

It would suggest that, but I think of it more of an augmentation of a connection to mon. And target just says 'adjacent mon.' if it was wild, it is most likely going to get you killed.......